Gender Disparity in National Institutes of Health Funding among Surgeon-Scientists from 1995 to 2020
IMPORTANCE Surgical diseases account for approximately 30% of the global burden of disease. Gender diversity in biomedical research is critical to generate innovative patient-centered research in surgery. OBJECTIVE To examine the distribution of biomedical research funding by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) among women and men surgeon-scientists during a 25-year period. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the NIH RePORTER (Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools: Expenditures and Results) database for research project grants awarded to women and men surgeon-scientists who were principal investigators between 1995 and 2020. Data were retrieved between January 20 and March 20, 2022. The representation of women surgeon-scientists among academic surgeons was compared with the representation of men surgeon-scientists over time. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Distribution of NIH funding to women and men surgeonscientists was examined via 2metrics: holding a large-dollar (ie, R01-equivalent) grant and being a super principal investigator (SPI) with $750 000 or more in total annual research funding. Statistical analysis was performed between April 1 and August 31, 2022. RESULTS Between 1995 and 2020, 2078 principal investigator surgeons received funding from the NIH. The proportion of women academic surgeons who were surgeon-scientists remained unchanged during this same period (1995, 14 of 792 [1.8%] vs 2020, 92 of 3834 [2.4%]; P = .10). Compared with their men counterparts, women surgeon-scientists obtained their first NIH grant earlier in their career (mean [SD] years after first faculty appointment, 8.8 [6.2] vs 10.8 [7.9] years; P < .001) and were as likely to obtain large-dollar grants (aRR, 0.99 [95%CI, 0.95-1.03]) during the period 2016 to 2020. Despite this success, women surgeon-scientists remained significantly underrepresented among SPIs and were 25%less likely to be an SPI (aRR, 0.75 [95%CI, 0.60-0.95] during the period 2016 to 2020). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this cross-sectional study of NIH-funded surgeons suggest that women surgeons remained underrepresented among surgeon-scientists over a 25-year period despite early career success in receiving NIH funding. This is concerning and warrants further investigation to increase the distribution of NIH funding among women surgeon-scientists.
Nguyen, Mytien; Gonzalez, Luis; Chaudhry, Sarwat I.; Ahuja, Nita; Pomahac, Bohdan; Newman, Ashley; Cannon, Ashley; Zarebski, Shenika A.; Dardik, Alan; and Boatright, Dowin, "Gender Disparity in National Institutes of Health Funding among Surgeon-Scientists from 1995 to 2020" (2023). Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine Program Open Access Publications. 7.